Smell the Clock
25 Feb, 08 > 2 Mar, 08
7 Jan, 08 > 13 Jan, 08
31 Dec, 07 > 6 Jan, 08
17 Dec, 07 > 23 Dec, 07
10 Dec, 07 > 16 Dec, 07
19 Nov, 07 > 25 Nov, 07
12 Nov, 07 > 18 Nov, 07
5 Nov, 07 > 11 Nov, 07
22 Oct, 07 > 28 Oct, 07
15 Oct, 07 > 21 Oct, 07
17 Sep, 07 > 23 Sep, 07
27 Aug, 07 > 2 Sep, 07
20 Aug, 07 > 26 Aug, 07
23 Jul, 07 > 29 Jul, 07
16 Jul, 07 > 22 Jul, 07
9 Jul, 07 > 15 Jul, 07
2 Jul, 07 > 8 Jul, 07
25 Jun, 07 > 1 Jul, 07
28 May, 07 > 3 Jun, 07
14 May, 07 > 20 May, 07
7 May, 07 > 13 May, 07
30 Apr, 07 > 6 May, 07
23 Apr, 07 > 29 Apr, 07
16 Apr, 07 > 22 Apr, 07
9 Apr, 07 > 15 Apr, 07
26 Mar, 07 > 1 Apr, 07
19 Mar, 07 > 25 Mar, 07
12 Mar, 07 > 18 Mar, 07
12 Feb, 07 > 18 Feb, 07
22 Jan, 07 > 28 Jan, 07
15 Jan, 07 > 21 Jan, 07
8 Jan, 07 > 14 Jan, 07
1 Jan, 07 > 7 Jan, 07
25 Dec, 06 > 31 Dec, 06
18 Dec, 06 > 24 Dec, 06
30 Oct, 06 > 5 Nov, 06
4 Sep, 06 > 10 Sep, 06
28 Aug, 06 > 3 Sep, 06
21 Aug, 06 > 27 Aug, 06
7 Aug, 06 > 13 Aug, 06
24 Jul, 06 > 30 Jul, 06
17 Jul, 06 > 23 Jul, 06
10 Jul, 06 > 16 Jul, 06
19 Jun, 06 > 25 Jun, 06
12 Jun, 06 > 18 Jun, 06
22 May, 06 > 28 May, 06
8 May, 06 > 14 May, 06
1 May, 06 > 7 May, 06
17 Apr, 06 > 23 Apr, 06
10 Apr, 06 > 16 Apr, 06
3 Apr, 06 > 9 Apr, 06
23 Jan, 06 > 29 Jan, 06
2 Jan, 06 > 8 Jan, 06
14 Nov, 05 > 20 Nov, 05
31 Oct, 05 > 6 Nov, 05
10 Oct, 05 > 16 Oct, 05
3 Oct, 05 > 9 Oct, 05
26 Sep, 05 > 2 Oct, 05
5 Sep, 05 > 11 Sep, 05
22 Aug, 05 > 28 Aug, 05
1 Aug, 05 > 7 Aug, 05
25 Jul, 05 > 31 Jul, 05
18 Jul, 05 > 24 Jul, 05
11 Jul, 05 > 17 Jul, 05
4 Jul, 05 > 10 Jul, 05
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
Sunday, 31 December 2006
Neither New Beginning nor Old End

I don't have any earth-shattering year's end entry to this blog, just some rambling thoughts on how the last year has gone and what's in store for the next.

2006 was a pretty good year for me as a runner. It started rather inauspiciously, with a 23:55 5k hampered by an untied shoelace but that would not have matched the previous year's time even if I had not wasted 30 seconds fumbling to tie a double bow with cold gloved fingers. Indeed, this was not my year for 5ks. I did record a 22:05 for a 5k on a course that was, um, uncertified, but other than that, the fastest one I turned was the 23:28 I did for a time trial in a pre-Thanksgiving turkey trot race. Still, the big picture for 2006 is all positive: out of 18 races I ran this year, I placed in the top 5 in my age group 5 times, finished in the top 3 four times, and won my age group 3 times. I ran my first sub-four-hour marathon this year in a race infamous for its relentless hills, and to cap it all off, won my track club's racing points series for my age group. I can't complain, and I won't.

Still, I want to get better, faster, fitter, and to have more fun. That's not a New Year's resolution, as I have but one standing New Year's resolution, which is not to make any fucking New Year's resolutions. Rather, I am motivated to work toward substantial improvement by several factors, including increased confidence (if I can train to finish the Spinx marathon in under 4 hrs., I can train to PR in some shorter races), better gear (the Garmin Forerunner 205 GPS device I got for Christmas), impending age (I estimate that I have until age 45 to reach maximum speed, though perhaps much later for endurance), and desire to get fitter (a resting pulse around 50, maybe?). That would be just as true if this were August 31 as it is tonight.

So tomorrow, no matter how I feel, I will be doing one of two things: 10x400 at the track if it's not too wet, or 25 min. tempo in the neighborhood if the track has too many puddles. Some way to spend a New Year's Day, I know; but I also know that I won't be the only one doing it. There are a hell of a lot of us out there, from all walks of life and with lots of different motivations. Some of us will have fancy GPs devices, some will have watches, and some will be equipped only with a pair of sturdy shoes and their thoughts. And tomorrow we'll be out there, in the air of the new year -- much like the old, but with a host of new possibilities as well as lots of scratched-out dates on registration forms and checks.


Posted by MHB at 11:56 PM EST
Updated: Friday, 5 January 2007 8:52 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 25 December 2006
James Brown (1933-2006)
I couldn't let this one go by without posting it.  James Brown was an eccentric, erratic, and occasionally even a dangerous man, but was also a unique artist who was often copied, but never equaled.

Posted by MHB at 12:34 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 17 December 2006
A New Beginning

After much thought and no action, I have finally realized that the only way to revamp this blog is to start writing -- oh yes, and to change the name. Baseball blogs are a dime a dozen, as are blogs specifically on the Braves; and sometimes I have nothing of substance to say about baseball, anyway. In fact, from the looks of this blog, I don't have anything substantial to say about it for weeks at a time, and this is especially true in the fall and winter months. 

As a result, the subject matter of this blog is about to broaden, still to include baseball on occasion but also to deal with other subjects such as politics and running. Indeed, it was my involvement in the sport of running that inspired the blog's new name, Smell the Clock. Perhaps I should explain:

There is a half-marathon that I run every year in Greer, SC. The course is surprisingly non-hilly for the Greenville area, but one of the obstacles one encounters along the course is a fast-food restaurant called The Clock, located on the side of the street at about the twelve-mile mark, that emanates a strong smell of frying chicken that under any other circumstances I would find quite appetizing but have a hard time stomaching after twelve miles of half-marathon-pace running. I had mentioned the smell to my wife after first running the race, and after I finished it the second time she asked me: "Did you smell the clock this time?" The more I thought about it, the more I find it an apt metaphor for running as well as for other aspects of life. Now sometimes when I'm nearing the end of a race, I think to myself: "you can smell the clock now. You are almost there."

I decided to make this phrase the new name for this blog yesterday morning, while running the brutal Paris Mountain 20k for the third time. I was considerably warmer yesterday than it usually is on the day of this race -- too warm, in fact, to run 2.5 miles  straight up a mountain and 4 back down, only to have to deal with several more miles of rolling hills before dragging wobbly legs and a sour stomach across the finish line. As I approached the final 2 miles, well off my PR pace, I caught the lipidinous aroma of Pete's, a diner similar to The Clock, and thought again about my Greer half-marathon experience. I knew that a name would come to me eventually, and that it would probably come at a time when I least expected it. And there it was. And here it is.


Posted by MHB at 1:39 PM EST
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 29 October 2006
In Memoriam

I had indicated earlier that I was going to shift the primary focus of this blog away from baseball; but I could not pass up the opportunity to celebrate the lives of two baseball's finest, who recently left us. I regret that I have been saddled with work obligations and thus was unable to comment upon the passing of Buck O'Neill in a timely manner, as he was undoubtedly a prominent figure in Negro League baseball and a pivotal one in the integration of Major League Baseball. In addition, he was reportedly one of the classiest men who ever played the game, a man who harbored no bitterness even though he had every right to do so, and a favorite interview subject of sportswriters. He will be sorely missed, but he had a long and fruitful life. Well done, sir.

And just today, I heard of the untimely passing of Joe Niekro, a man who, while not as great a player or prominent a figure as Buck O'Neill (not to mention his brother Phil), was a colorful character with a long and distinguished career. One of my favorite Joe Niekro stories involves a Ball-doctoring incident that occurred during his final season with the Astros (yeah, I know cheating normally isn't funny, but this was; and besides, ball-doctoring is far from the worst transgression that baseball players regularly commit: steroids, anyone?). Anyway, I don't recall who the Astros were playing, or who the umpires were, but the opposing manager accused Niekro of having an emery board in his possession, which he was allegedly using to scuff baseballs. When the entire umpiring crew went to the mound to confront him, Niekro decided to try an old schoolboy trick on them. Palming the emery board in his right hand, in one deft motion he dropped it to the ground at hip level while raising his hands in the air, palms outward, to show that he had nothing in them. The funny thing is, in a stadium full of people and with four umpires looking directly at him, it almost worked. Three of the four umpires looked up at his hands; but a fourth looked down, and seeing the emery board lying on the mound at Niekro's feet, picked it up and summarily gave Joe the heave-ho. It still ranks as one of the funniest damn things that I have ever seen in my thirty-plus years of following Major League Baseball.


Posted by MHB at 3:16 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 4 September 2006
Totally Off Base

First, let's get the baseball out of the way. The Braves split two doubleheaders with the Phillies this weekend, which wasn't enough. the second game Saturday and the first game yesterday were quite ugly. Now they have to play three games against the Mets, which will likely be even uglier. The season is, for all intents and purposes, over.

Now to something that, while no more pleasant or relevant, is at least original.

The first time I saw a promo for the movie Snakes on a Plane, I thought: "Great. The world just got a little stupider." Yet I had no idea just how much stupider: for not only was such a moronic title taken in stride, it was praised for its straightforwardness and its "sledgehammer effect."

So this is the wave of the future now: banal movie titles written in the simplest English possible: I should have seen it coming. After all, it is the reign of King George II, and nuance is for sissies.

So what can we look forward to in this brave new post- intellectual world? Here are some movie titles that we may well be seeing in the not-so-distant future:

      1. People Blowing Shit Up

      2. Lots of Car Chases and Stuff

      3. Talking Babies are Funny

      4. Excuse for Naomi Watts to Wear Something Skimpy

       5. Tired, Recycled Crap, Part II

       6. Some Chinese Guys Fighting

       7. Ron Howard Wants More Money

       8. Black Cop White Cop

       9. Trying to Make Women Cry

     10. Monsters! Aieeee!


Posted by MHB at 8:08 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 4 September 2006 11:45 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 26 August 2006
So You Wanna Play, Huh?

Here is an old (2003) discussion thread I found through Google, apparently from a USC fan site, which calls Bart Wright's journalistic integrity into question. I suggest that the reader take it with a grain of salt, as the posters have obvious biases; but some of the complaints made there concerning suggesting tendencies toward vindictiveness and playing fast and loose with facts sound very familiar. For example, at the top of the thread is a long and thougtful post, in which the poster complained that Wright "jumped feet first into a controversial topic without doing his homework." That sounds a lot like the Bart Wright I've come to know and love in the past few days.

What his reply to me made abundantly clear was that he does not have much regard for facts. To Bart, life's a big game of "Survivor," where loyalty and alliances matter more than anything else. That shows in the assumptions he made about me, e.g., I appeared to him to be "against" downtown, so therefore I must be "for" the county council; which is absurd, for I can't stand most of them, either. 

By the way, I am unsure of the exact nature of the incident or incidents in question, or what was in that FAX that they were discussing. If I find out anything more, I will post it.

 UPDATE: Here's a link to Wright's original column about the FAX incident, which apparently concerned alleged dirty recruiting by USC. He was indeed quite nasty with his detractors, at one point subtly suggesting that they might be pedophiles.

It's looking more and more like there might be a pattern here. I plan to keep looking, and to post anything of substance that I find.

Bart Wright fucked with the wrong "Internet chatter nerd" this time.

UPDATE II: More evidence of inconsistency in Bart Wright's reporting.

"I guess it take all kinds"


Posted by MHB at 2:35 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 10:52 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 24 August 2006
Now It's personal (Apparently)

I tried to post this in a lengthy entry last night, which was lost. One of these days I'll remember to copy before I post. Anyway, I want to get this up before I go to work, so if it's a bit too brief, I'll flesh it out later.

Below is a copy of an e-mail I sent to Greenville News sports columnist Bart Wright, whose in his column in Monday's edition singing the praises of the new downtown ballpark invited criticism of the new park and comparison to the old. The letter I sent him is unremarkable in itself. In fact, most of it is a condensation of the "Highway to Hell" entry on this blog that describes my unpleasant experiences at West End Field and why I liked the atmosphere of the old ballpark better.

What is remarkable is Mr. Wright's nasty reply to my message. Anyone reading both letters can see that I was nothing but a gentleman to Mr. Wright, and never attacked him personally. He, on the other hand, treated me like something he had just scraped off the bottom of his shoe.

Mr. Wright chose to dismiss my specific criticisms of the new ballpark as the product of a "grudge" that is "political in nature," an increasingly popular means of discrediting an argument with which one does not agree. But what I cannot figure out is what side he thinks I'm on. Am I a ranting redneck or a filthy hippie? It's hard to tell from the tone of his message.

Looks like I hit a nerve when I criticized the downtown business elite. Which is understandable; after all, he works for their booster organ. To be fair, he does make a couple of good points; but they are obscured by the arrogant, condescending tone of his message -- not to mention a host of typos. One thing I do wish to clarify right here, right now is that I DO like downtown Greenville -- which is why I don't want to see these assholes fuck it up.

By the way, one would think that a professional writer would proof his messages better.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael H. Burchett
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 7:22 AM
To: Wright, Bart
Subject: West End Field

Dear Mr. Wright:
I read with interest your column in Monday's edition entitled "West End Field Meets Expectations," in which you touted the financial success of the stadium and promised to inform your readers when "somebody writes to say the old ballpark was better." While it is true that the old ballpark had its problems and was in dire need of refurbishing or replacement, and that the new park downtown is far from aesthetically displeasing, I will state without reservation that baseball in Greenville has suffered greatly as a result of the G-Braves' departure. Nothing could have reversed the damage that this move caused, and while the initial financial success of the new team would appear to bode well for baseball in Greenville, I believe that this success is illusory and may well be short-lived. If the city's recent track record with regard to minor legue sports is any indication, the end will come sooner rather than later, and will be quite ugly.
In case you haven't figured it out by now, I am still quite bitter over the departure of the G-Braves, whose games my wife and I had attended ever since our arrival to the area in 1994. Nevertheless, we were willing to give the new team a try, attending three games the first season and one in the new ballpark this season. And while I no longer inclined to say "never" about anything, I can say without reservation that I have no plans ever to return to West End Field.
Although I am not a lifelong resident of the area, I have become quite familiar with the history of Greenville and am aware that the downtown business elite has tended to look down upon baseball as a pastime associated with mill culture -- that is, until they realized that there was money in it, and that a downtown ballpark would make a fine centerpiece for a lavish spread of real estate development. Then the game was on. Don't get me wrong: I do not hold the Braves blameless for what happened. This is perhaps as much their fault as it is the city's. Yet from what I know of the circumstances surrounding their departure, it appear to me that a crucial step for the downtown business elite in wresting baseball out of the hands of the mill people was to get the Braves out of the picture. Obviously, they succeeded, and they got their downtown ballpark. Yet it is equally obvious from my recent visit to West End Field that they quite simply do not know how to do baseball, and quite likely do not care. Frankly, the financial success that you cited indicates that they do not have to care.
Funny you should mention the scoreboard, for that is one of the first things my wife and I noticed upon our arrival at the ballpark. I am familiar with the scoreboard at Fenway, and I believe that duplicating it is a nice touch -- or would be, anyway, had the person hired to operate it actually kept up with the game. As it were, one had to devote one's entire attention to the game to know the number of outs, the ball-strike count -- you know, those things that scoreboards normally keep track of so you don't have to.
That was but the first of many indicators that something was wrong. A second, and more glaring problem, became evident around the middle of the second inning, when the seats in our section began to fill with chronically-late Greenvillians. I had noticed when we took our seats that our usher had not checked our tickets when we started down the aisle, but had merely returned our eye contact and said "enjoy the game." Now, I can excuse the gentleman for not getting up to greet us, for, you see, he was in a wheelchair, and while I am a strong advocate of ADA and of hiring the disabled, it occurs to me that policing an entire section of seats to which the only access is a narrow row of steep concrete steps is not a good job to give to a man in a wheelchair. There were many, many other jobs in the stadium that this man, whom I'm sure is quite capable, could have done.

Nevertheless, I don't think that it would have made a difference had an ambulatory person been assigned to the section; for there seemed to be no oversight of seating whatsoever anywhere in the ballpark -- a sharp contrast to the policy in the old stadium, where the ushers were quite proactive in assisting fans with locating their seats and making certain that everyone was in the right seat and behaving in a manner that did not interfere with the enjoyment of other fans. Now, in thirty-plus years of attending games at various levels, I have come to accept that ballparks are full of fans, and fans sometimes are rowdy, and although it grates at my nerves sometimes, they paid for their tickets just like me, and anyway, they aren't hurting anyone. But there's a difference between normal fan behavior and obnoxous-jerk behavior, and the non-presence of the ushers was a tacit invitation for those inclined to behave like obnoxious jerks to do what they do best. And while I was not offended by the loud profanity going on behind me, it is possible that the families in front of me, many of whom had small children, might have been.

Yet the larger problem with the lack of seating supervision was the rampant seat-stealing that went on around me during the course of the game. Around the third inning, a family three rows down from me, a couple with a small child and an infant, left their seats for a few minutes only to return to find a group of fraternity boys and their girlfriends occupying them. They chose not to press the issue, instead sitting a couple of rows forward and politely asking the chuckling young men to hand their belongings down to them. Why they did not attempt to get a usher, I did not know. They would not have had to at the old ballpark.
Then there was the "entertainment," which put the cap on this cheap sideshow that we had foolishly mistaken for a baseball game. I also know from experience that baseball and cheesy entertainment go together: after all, there are lots of kids there, and they have to go for the lowest common denominator. Yet there was no commonality in the asinine fare offered that evening and, I'm presuming, every evening. Lulls between innings at the old ballpark were filled with the family-fun time typical of minor-league ballpark: promotional games and giveaways, t-shirt cannons, etc.. What we got instead at West End Field was a clowning dwarf, whose schtick consisted mostly of ridiculously-oversized props, exaggerated dancing, and on one occasion, pretending to call the pitcher's warmup tosses like an umpire while wearing a Darth Vader helmet. By this point, I had passed beyond annoyed into the realm of embarrassed: embarrassed for my city, embarrassed for my country, and embarrassed that I had willingly, albeit not knowingly, purchased a ticket to this foul spectacle. Apparently, we were not alone in our belief that this crap was not funny, for few people around us were laughing (not even the loud, obnoxious jerks behind us), and some of them even looked disturbed by it. It was typical of the level of humor that pervaded the evening (playing the sound of glass breaking over the PA everytime a ball is fouled out of the park is not funny the first time, much less the 36th) with the added dimension of being quite offensive -- and as anyone who knows me can tell you, I am not easily offended.

We left after the sixth inning, and although I no longer say never about very much, I can say that I have no plans ever to return to West End Field, even if the Rome Braves are in town. The whole thing smacked of arrogance, of cavalier treatment, of greed.

I can see them now, sitting in their meetings, dinners, receptions, clubhouses. I can hear them planning how to get the lintheads and rednecks through the turnstiles: don't bother with painting the dimensions on the fence: we had to make it too short, and most of them can't count that high anyway; jack up the radar gun, so they think they're seeing 100-MPH fastballs out of these kids; my sister's no-account son-in-law needs a job, maybe he can work the scoreboard; don't worry about the seating policy, they like to steal seats from each other, they're a bunch of animals, anyway; give 'em a dancing midget, they like stuff like that.
What's truly sad is that, apparently, they are right.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to express my opinion. I enjoy your column and read it regularly, even when I disagree with you, which is not often.
Sincerely,
Michael H. Burchett
Greenville
Thanks for the note, though I must admit it was hard to find the part I had asked for, namely people who didn't like the ballpark
Maybe I missed it, but I read a lot that you didn't like about the employees and their interaction or lack of same with fans, which is odd, because you seem to be suggesting you liked it at the old ballpark, which was operated by the same ownership. The same ownership employed the mascot you seem to like and the one you seem not to like. The same management oversaw the dumb stunts between innings and such last year and the ones this year.
But you are right, I gleaned quickly you don't like downtown from the code working "downtown elite," which I always find illuminating because it was the lack of interest on the part of the county council to spend a penny on the G-Braves that ultimately chased them away. Had the copunty[sic] council matched the city council investment, the G-Braves would almost certainly still be here, yet as soon as the G-Braves were gone the county coincil [sic] came up with $18 million almost overnight to attract a new team to the suburbs (which was shouted down by the people who live there).
So, while I don't understand it, I get the grudge is political in nature and I'm sure the team would want to hear about employees behaving badly. I'll pass this on, but remove your name.
The biggest irony is that this ownership, while no friends of mine (meaning I doin't [sic] have a relationship with them), aren't even trying to make a profit. They dumped more than $16 million of their own money into it (which people always say they want to see from owners, rather than draining the public for their ballparks), and are opering [sic] on a break even basis when it comes to concession prices and all the rest.
Yet people like to point to the downtown elite as the bad people.
As one who consoider [sic] the old park the worst I have ever visited, and this one among the best, I guess it take [sic] all kinds.
Appreciate you writing, all the same
 

Posted by MHB at 7:38 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 10:56 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 5 August 2006
August Reflections
Unfortunately, like the Braves, this blog has turned out to be an enormous bust this year. It's my own fault, no one else's; and since I am, to my knowledge, the only visitor to this blog, I write this only for cyber-posterity, for I believe that all experiments, no matter how futile, should be thoroughly documented.

Don't let the tone fool you. I write this with a light heart and an ear for humor, as well as a blogger's sense of the possible. I have no reason to be hung up, after all. I'm the only one here.

It is obvious that the Braves are in a rebulding year -- obvious, that is, to everyone but them. True to form, they made yet another bad pre-deadline trade, dealing off a piece of their future for a short-term fix, made even more pointless by the fact that their chances of making the postseason this year are slim and none.

But unlike the Braves' management, I am fully aware of my limitations, and do not intend to attempt any last-minute heroics with this blog this season. Like the Braves, it is done, at least for the short term. It will, however, go on, although in what form I cannot say with certainty at this point. While I will likely continue to write about the Braves, there is a good chance that they will not be the primary focus of this blog in the future. I will doubtless continue to write about baseball; but baseball may not always be the focus. After all, there is so much else going on in the world, and much of it is interesting. And absurd. And maddening. It deserves to be written about. And let's face it: the Braves suck this year.

Posted by MHB at 9:23 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 5 August 2006 12:56 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, 22 July 2006
Wickman Yet to Get Save Op
Between Ken Ray's self-destruction last night and the rainout today, we have yet to see Wickman take the mound in a Braves uniform. I do believe that the Braves will get their money's worth out of him, given that the sacrifice they made was quite small. I saw Max Ramirez catch for Rome earlier this season during my disappointing trip to the new Greenville ballpark (see "Highway to Hell" below), and thought he looked O.K.; but the Braves have an overabundance of catching talent in their organization, including better prospects than Ramirez. In sum, it was a good trade, and perhaps the only one that they will make.

Posted by MHB at 9:18 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 20 July 2006
Braves Acquire Wickman from Indians

It looks like the Braves may have finally found themselves a closer, and didn't have to pay a huge price for him (minor league catcher Max Ramirez).

The second half just might be interesting after all.


Posted by MHB at 11:50 PM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older